Or, are you? |
A long time ago, my ex-wife and I tried to go play a roleplaying game with some friends of hers that I had never met. This was in the days of 3.5 edition D&D, when Wizards of the Coast allowed third party companies to use their basic ruleset as a framework for basically anything they wanted to build, with mixed results (I’m looking at you, Book of Erotic Fantasy…) This particular game used an adaptation of the ruleset that I’m rather fond of to play in Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time setting. We met, exchanged pleasantries, and sat down to the game. I’m the person I am, so I had of course built a male channeler, which meant that by my character’s very nature he was going to ultimately be driven mad by his magic and would be shunned and feared by basically anyone we met. The Gamemaster, a likeable enough fellow, had built a story somewhere in the middle of the second or third book, I think (it’s been more than a decade since the game, and I haven’t read any of the books in nearly the same amount of time.)
I noticed right away that he was
doing a lot of the things I would call “New Gamemaster Mistakes.” The story was
tied into an established fiction storyline that we couldn’t change because it
was in the novels. We met the main character of the story mainly so he could
show us how cool he was and how not cool we were by comparison. Our characters
didn’t have much in the way of agency in his world, and when I tried to take a
left turn to do something unexpected I was quickly nudged back onto the railroad
tracks.
That said, I wasn’t exactly the ideal
player for them, either. When a combat broke out, I immediately fell into the
type of high-end, tactical gameplay that my group always used (some of our
campaigns have, at times, essentially turned into more of a miniatures wargame
than a roleplaying game.) I tried to take advantage of flanking rules, and was
met with puzzled looks in exchange. Once I realized the amount of structure and
flow that the GM and his wife wanted to impose on the game, I immediately tried
to buck it and shake it off. Nobody was arguing and we all had some fun, but it
was awkward and we weren’t invited back. For a long time, I thought that the
fault lay with him for being a newer GM, reasoning that if they were able to
play at my “level” that we would have gotten along just fine. Basically, I
couldn’t have been more wrong.
How people have the balls to listen to Posehn, Oswalt, Agee, and co. playing an RPG for their amusement and say "God, L2P newbs" I'll never understand. |
Fast forward to today and I’m a
little wiser and more experienced, and I can see now the mistakes I made. RPG
players are, for the most part, a more accepting lot than gamer community at
large, but we still have our issues. The people that play online through Twitch
or Youtube could probably tell you about the worst of them, namely the need to
explain that the way you’re playing your roleplaying game is somehow wrong, and
the way I’m doing it is right. Brian Posehn’s Nerd Poker crew get a lot of this
since his players learned to play in 2nd edition and have
essentially kept the skill system from that game in their 4th and 5th
edition games. They say up front that they don’t play the rules as written in
the book, not because it’s better but just because that’s what they know and
don’t want to have to learn something different. And yet, you can tell from the
occasional mentions on the show that nerds are still emailing them with
metaphorical “push-up-the-glasses-and-tell-them-actually-you’re-doing-it-wrong”
BS constantly. This idea of Wrongbadfun is weirdly pervasive amongst RPGers,
and I’d be lying if I said I don’t still have a twinge of it today, but I’m
working on it. I realize now, looking back, that I was just as bad when I went
to those people’s Wheel of Time game.
So what if I didn’t typically play the same style of game that they did? Why
should they have to adapt to what I liked? They wanted to hang out with Rand al’Thor
and relive the feelings they got from reading the books, not tactically
dismantle an ambush by skillfully maneuvering miniatures around on a map. What
right did I have to show up in their house and try to yuck their yum? Truth be
told, the player I am today would have been right there with them (but I’d
still be trying to set his tent on fire. Rand needs to lighten up.)
This is a lesson I’ve tried to
adapt with the game I’m perpetually trying to start with my “not-so-into-RPGs”
kids. They’re new to table top gaming, and similarly disinterested in rules
crunch. I’ve essentially started from a full-fledged RPG system and, over time,
cut it down over every iteration to try and find something that will get out of
the way and let them just PLAY. My current effort is using one of the most
minimalistic systems I’ve ever seen, a game designed for kids by Monte Cook
Games called No Thank You, Evil that
only has four stats and resolves everything with a d6 roll. I’m trying to run
them through a version of Dragons of
Autumn Twilight from the Dragonlance setting, but if it goes somewhere else
that’s alright, too. My girls’ characters are an archer who, after we finished
character design, ended up blind from a goblin ambush and a dancer who fights
with rainbow colored energy whips, a far cry from the much more traditional
Tanis Half-Elven and Raistlin Majere for whom the module was originally written.
We didn’t get a chance to actually run through the first session before they
left for the summer, but when my turn comes around to pick what we’re doing on
family Friday night, they’ll be headed for the Inn of the Last Home. Hopefully
I’ll be a good enough GM to get out of their way and let them play the game
they want, not the one I want them to play.
No comments:
Post a Comment